ricochet

> > The TWIN TOWERS were NOT brought down by the 2
> > planes only.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > You must have read the earlier theory that.....
> >
> >
> > The TWIN TOWERS were NOT brought down by the 2
> > planes only.
> >
> >
> > Also that there was no plane involved in the
> > Pentagon attack...but a missile probably !!
> >
> > NOW READ THIS !!!!!!!!
> >
> > Reading this makes you wonder how very much true and
> > linked is the earlier theory by some research
> > students in US as to how it was not possiblefor this
> > to happen only by the crashing of airplanes.
> >
> >
> > You've got to be lucky to make $4 Billion killing on
> > a 6-month investment of $124 Million
> >
> > Larry Silverstein
> > is the New York property tycoon who purchased the
> > entire WTC complex just 6 months prior to the 9/11
> > attacks. That was the first time in its 33-year
> > history the complex had EVER changed ownership.
> >
> >
> > Mr. Silverstein's first order of business as the new
> > owner was to change the company responsible for the
> > security of the complex. The new security company he
> > hired was Securacom (now Stratasec).
> > George W. Bush's brother, Marvin Bush, was on its
> > board of directors , and Marvin's cousin, Wirt
> > Walker III, was its CEO.
> >
> > According to public records, not only did Securacom
> > provide electronic security for the World Trade
> > Center, it also covered Dulles International Airport
> > and United Airlines THE two key players in the 9/11
> > attacks.
> >
> >
> > The company was backed by an investment firm, the
> > Kuwait-American Corp., also
> > linked for many years to the Bush family. KuwAm has
> > been linked to the Bush family since the Gulf War.
> >
> > One of its principals and a member of the Kuwaiti
> > royal family, Mishal Yousef Saud al Sabah, served on
> > the board of Stratesec.
> >
> >
> > Now, consider:
> >
> > The members of a small cabal owned the WTC complex,
> > controlled its electronic security, and also
> > controlled the security not only for one of the
> > airlines whose aircraft were hijacked on 9/11, but
> > the airport from which they originated.
> >
> >
> > Another little "coincidence " -- Mr. Silversten, who
> > made a down-payment of $124 million on this $3.2
> > billion complex, promptly insured it for $7
> > billion. Not only that, he covered the complex
> > against "terrorist attacks".
> >
> >
> > Following the attacks, Silverstein filed TWO
> > insurance claims for the maximum amount of the
> > policy ($7B), based on the two – in Silverstein's
> > view -- separate attacks.
> >
> >
> >
> > The insurance company, Swiss Re, paid Mr.
> > Silverstein $4.6 Billion!!..... a princely return
> > on a relatively paltry
> >
> > investment of $124 million.
> >
> > There 's more
> > .
> >
> > You see, the World Trade Towers were not the real
> > estate plum we are led to believe. From an economic
> > standpoint, the trade center -- subsidized since its
> > inception by the NY Port Authority -- has never
> > functioned, nor was it intended to function,
> > unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate
> > marketplace.
> >
> >
> > How could Silverstein Group have been ignorant of
> > this? The towers required some $200 million in
> > renovations and improvements, most of which related
> > to removal and replacement of building materials
> > declared to be health hazards in the years since the
> > towers were built. It was well-known by the city of
> > New York that the WTC was an asbestos bombshell.
> > For years, the Port Authority treated the building
> > like an aging dinosaur, attempting on several
> > occasions to get permits to demolish the building
> > for liability reasons, but being turned down due the
> > known asbestos problem. Further, it was well-known
> > the only reason the building was still standing
> > until 9/11 was because it was too costly to
> > disassemble the twin towers floor by floor since the
> > Port Authority was prohibited legally from
> > demolishing the buildings. The projected cost to
> > disassemble the towers: $15 Billion. Just the
> > scaffolding for the operation was estimated at $2.4
> > Billion!
> >
> >
> > In other words, the Twin Towers were condemned
> > structures. How convenient that an unexpected
> > "terrorist" attack demolished the buildings
> > completely.
> >
> >
> > WTC Building 7 was a part of the WTC complex, and
> > covered under the same insurance policy. This
> > 47-storey steel-framed structure,
> > which was NOT struck by an aircraft, mysteriously
> > collapsed 8 hours later that same day into its own
> > footprint at freefall speed - exactly in the manner
> > of the Twin Towers.
> >
> > How could this have happened? Mr. Silverstein gave
> > the world the answer when he slipped up during a PBS
> > television interview a year later
> > , on 9/11/2002:
> >
> >
> > "I remember getting a call from the...er...fire
> > department commander, telling me that they were not
> > sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire,
> > and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life,
> > maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. ' And
> > they made that decision to pull and we watched the
> > building collapse." As anyone who knows anything
> > about construction can tell you, "Pull" is common
> > industry jargon for a controlled demolition.
> >
> >
> > One thing is for sure, the decision to 'pull' WTC 7
> > would have delighted many people Especially because
> > it has been reported that thousands of sensitive
> > files relating to some of the biggest financial
> > scams in history
> > � including Enron and WorldCom -- were stored in
> > the offices of some of the building'stenants:
> > �
> > US Secret Service �
> > NSA
> > � CIA
> > � IRS
> > � BATF
> > � SEC
> > � NAIC Securities
> > � Salomon Smith Barney
> > � American Express Bank International
> > � Standard Chartered Bank
> > � Provident Financial Management
> > � ITT Hartford Insurance Group
> > � Federal Home Loan Bank.
> >
> > The Securities and Exchange Commission has not
> > quantified the number of active cases in which
> > substantial files were destroyed by the collapse of
> > WTC 7. Reuters news service and the Los Angeles
> > Times published reports estimating them at 3,000 to
> > 4,000. They include the agency's major inquiry into
> > the manner in which investment banks divvied up hot
> > shares of initial public offerings during the
> > high-tech boom. ..."Ongoing investigations at the
> > New York SEC will be dramatically affected because
> > so much of their work is paper-intensive," said Max
> > Berger of New York's Bernstein Litowitz Berger &
> > Grossmann. "This is a disaster for these cases."
> >
> >
> > Citigroup says some information that the committee
> > is seeking [about WorldCom] was destroyed in the
> > Sept. 11 terror attack on the World Trade Center.
> > Salomon had offices in 7 World Trade Center. The
> > bank says that back-up tapes of corporate emails
> > from September 1998 through December 2000 were
> > stored at the building and destroyed in the attack.
> >
> >